<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mine is Better Than Yours&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pcweenies.com/2009/07/02/mine-is-better-than-yours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pcweenies.com/2009/07/02/mine-is-better-than-yours/</link>
	<description>Tech Comics for Sys Admins, IT Professionals, Engineers and Computer Geeks!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:19:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zorklat DeOrc</title>
		<link>http://pcweenies.com/2009/07/02/mine-is-better-than-yours/#comment-2620</link>
		<dc:creator>Zorklat DeOrc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcweenies.com/?p=2059#comment-2620</guid>
		<description>I like Linux, with Mint being my favorite distro.  But one of the first things I said in &lt;a href=&quot;http://ofwineandwarcraft.blogspot.com/2009/12/signs-you-should-not-use-linux.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Signs You Should Not Use Linux&lt;/a&gt; is that it&#039;s not for everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Linux, with Mint being my favorite distro.  But one of the first things I said in <a href="http://ofwineandwarcraft.blogspot.com/2009/12/signs-you-should-not-use-linux.html" rel="nofollow">Signs You Should Not Use Linux</a> is that it&#8217;s not for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charismatic Enigma</title>
		<link>http://pcweenies.com/2009/07/02/mine-is-better-than-yours/#comment-2619</link>
		<dc:creator>Charismatic Enigma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 01:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcweenies.com/?p=2059#comment-2619</guid>
		<description>A note about computer crashes, perhaps the most irritating issue I&#039;ve come across regarding Windows users:

Theoretically, Windows should never crash on you, provided you have enough hardware to support what you&#039;re trying to accomplish. (You can&#039;t make a respectable video editing workstation out of an older machine with 128 Mb of RAM.) For the record, my WinXP machine never crashes on me.

A big problem is that, in my experience, people who routinely crash their Windows machines seem to be incapable of taking the hint that they are DOING IT WRONG. If you have seventeen different programs running all at once, you are basically begging your CPU to have a stroke.

Patience is, now more than ever, a virtue. &quot;Come on! Load, you b******!&quot; is something I&#039;ve uttered more than once myself, but if your machine is consistently and reliably slower than molasses in an igloo... you have two options. 1) Get a new machine. 2) Put on your big boy/girl panties and get used to it.

I was indoctrinated into Windows as a teenager because we used a network of iMacs at my elementary and middle schools, which had roughly the computing power of an abacus. I wouldn&#039;t object to learning how use an Mac machine, but I have long since become comfortable with working around Windows&#039; flaws (which includes ignoring the fact that Vista ever existed). I would probably not switch over even if I thought Mac was a far more efficient system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A note about computer crashes, perhaps the most irritating issue I&#8217;ve come across regarding Windows users:</p>
<p>Theoretically, Windows should never crash on you, provided you have enough hardware to support what you&#8217;re trying to accomplish. (You can&#8217;t make a respectable video editing workstation out of an older machine with 128 Mb of RAM.) For the record, my WinXP machine never crashes on me.</p>
<p>A big problem is that, in my experience, people who routinely crash their Windows machines seem to be incapable of taking the hint that they are DOING IT WRONG. If you have seventeen different programs running all at once, you are basically begging your CPU to have a stroke.</p>
<p>Patience is, now more than ever, a virtue. &#8220;Come on! Load, you b******!&#8221; is something I&#8217;ve uttered more than once myself, but if your machine is consistently and reliably slower than molasses in an igloo&#8230; you have two options. 1) Get a new machine. 2) Put on your big boy/girl panties and get used to it.</p>
<p>I was indoctrinated into Windows as a teenager because we used a network of iMacs at my elementary and middle schools, which had roughly the computing power of an abacus. I wouldn&#8217;t object to learning how use an Mac machine, but I have long since become comfortable with working around Windows&#8217; flaws (which includes ignoring the fact that Vista ever existed). I would probably not switch over even if I thought Mac was a far more efficient system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qka</title>
		<link>http://pcweenies.com/2009/07/02/mine-is-better-than-yours/#comment-2618</link>
		<dc:creator>qka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 04:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcweenies.com/?p=2059#comment-2618</guid>
		<description>I have a lot of &quot;elderly&quot; clients who support the case that Windows is not easy for old people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a lot of &#8220;elderly&#8221; clients who support the case that Windows is not easy for old people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theala Sildorian</title>
		<link>http://pcweenies.com/2009/07/02/mine-is-better-than-yours/#comment-2617</link>
		<dc:creator>Theala Sildorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcweenies.com/?p=2059#comment-2617</guid>
		<description>Pretty much the biggest issue for me is stability and plug n play.  I use a Mac at home, and Win XP at work.  There are some work specific applications I have to use for my job that are Windows only (horribly written software, but that&#039;s not Microsoft&#039;s fault).  My issue with my Windows machine is it locks up and crashes on me at least once a day.  Yesterday I came close to losing a chapter I was writing for a textbook--I&#039;d saved moments before the crash.

My Mac never crashes on me.  Ever.

My other issue is plug and play.  I plug a peripheral to my Mac, and it works.  Period.  No fussing, no sweating.  It just works.  Not so with our Windows machines at work.  It&#039;s a toss up from day to day as to whether it will work when all the stuff is turned on.  If I bring my Mac laptop in and plug the projector into that, it works fine.  If I use the school&#039;s computer (Win) with the same projector it will work one day and not the next.  Or I might get video but no sound.  It&#039;ll take me a good 15-30 minutes of fussing with it before I can start class (good thing for me I get to work at 7am).

It gets old quick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty much the biggest issue for me is stability and plug n play.  I use a Mac at home, and Win XP at work.  There are some work specific applications I have to use for my job that are Windows only (horribly written software, but that&#8217;s not Microsoft&#8217;s fault).  My issue with my Windows machine is it locks up and crashes on me at least once a day.  Yesterday I came close to losing a chapter I was writing for a textbook&#8211;I&#8217;d saved moments before the crash.</p>
<p>My Mac never crashes on me.  Ever.</p>
<p>My other issue is plug and play.  I plug a peripheral to my Mac, and it works.  Period.  No fussing, no sweating.  It just works.  Not so with our Windows machines at work.  It&#8217;s a toss up from day to day as to whether it will work when all the stuff is turned on.  If I bring my Mac laptop in and plug the projector into that, it works fine.  If I use the school&#8217;s computer (Win) with the same projector it will work one day and not the next.  Or I might get video but no sound.  It&#8217;ll take me a good 15-30 minutes of fussing with it before I can start class (good thing for me I get to work at 7am).</p>
<p>It gets old quick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oranges</title>
		<link>http://pcweenies.com/2009/07/02/mine-is-better-than-yours/#comment-2616</link>
		<dc:creator>oranges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcweenies.com/?p=2059#comment-2616</guid>
		<description>It is great that people quote me using the inccorrect context ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is great that people quote me using the inccorrect context ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madbard</title>
		<link>http://pcweenies.com/2009/07/02/mine-is-better-than-yours/#comment-2615</link>
		<dc:creator>madbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcweenies.com/?p=2059#comment-2615</guid>
		<description>tastes great vs less filling.

mary ann vs ginger.

and JoT told us is it now &quot;kirk vs picard vs kirk 2.0&quot;. http://www.geekculture.com/joyoftech/joyarchives/1242.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tastes great vs less filling.</p>
<p>mary ann vs ginger.</p>
<p>and JoT told us is it now &#8220;kirk vs picard vs kirk 2.0&#8243;. <a href="http://www.geekculture.com/joyoftech/joyarchives/1242.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.geekculture.com/joyoftech/joyarchives/1242.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trinalin</title>
		<link>http://pcweenies.com/2009/07/02/mine-is-better-than-yours/#comment-2614</link>
		<dc:creator>trinalin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcweenies.com/?p=2059#comment-2614</guid>
		<description>The state technology list (for schools) always has flareups of Winders vs Mac every couple of months or so.  Gets tired fast.  OSes are a matter of preference, all have positives &amp; negatives.

I&#039;m now using 4 different OSes on all my laptops &amp; PC: Winders XP Home, Ubuntu 8.04, Ubuntu 9.04, and Winders 7 RC1. I&#039;ll probably buy Winders 7 when it comes out (unless they screw it up between now and then).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The state technology list (for schools) always has flareups of Winders vs Mac every couple of months or so.  Gets tired fast.  OSes are a matter of preference, all have positives &amp; negatives.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m now using 4 different OSes on all my laptops &amp; PC: Winders XP Home, Ubuntu 8.04, Ubuntu 9.04, and Winders 7 RC1. I&#8217;ll probably buy Winders 7 when it comes out (unless they screw it up between now and then).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gonzalexx</title>
		<link>http://pcweenies.com/2009/07/02/mine-is-better-than-yours/#comment-2613</link>
		<dc:creator>gonzalexx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcweenies.com/?p=2059#comment-2613</guid>
		<description>ACK&gt;.. shows you how much PC Weenies I&#039;ve been reading (what a shame) ... I didn&#039;t know Bob was a linux guy... always thought he was an Apple person.
Excellent strip!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ACK&gt;.. shows you how much PC Weenies I&#8217;ve been reading (what a shame) &#8230; I didn&#8217;t know Bob was a linux guy&#8230; always thought he was an Apple person.<br />
Excellent strip!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Walsh</title>
		<link>http://pcweenies.com/2009/07/02/mine-is-better-than-yours/#comment-2612</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcweenies.com/?p=2059#comment-2612</guid>
		<description>Stoney, the commands are relatively simply. There are right click mouses for the mac, any mouse I have bought from the Windows/Linux world works on my macs. The only difference is really instead of control you hit the command button. I use both Windows and Mac on a daily basis, jumping from one to the other over a KVM. Using a windows keyboard, I just hit the windows button on the mac or the control button on the PC. Its the same thing.

Overall, as a person who has used Windows all the way back to Win3.5, FreeBSD, Linux and its derivative Ubuntu, as well as MacOS from 3-X, I have to say the best experience I have had was on MacOS. Now as for Stoney&#039;s first part of his comment, I have to agree, each one offered its pros, but it also offered its cons. But imo those pros and cons varied depending on the user. where as I find windows limiting in music production quality that I get from MacOS or Ubuntu. Windows availability is better for any games. Although this is no longer so mainstream, since the inclusion of intel processors I&#039;m seeing more and more coming to the MacOS. Ubuntu, well I couldn&#039;t do much except music work, as we go back to availability, there isn&#039;t just that much.

All in all, it is the user in the end, and whatever they choose, thats what they use. I always recommend a unix based OS, so MacOS or Linux, and in most cases my friends will listen. However, the mac is costly, can only be used on their hardware, the pc is cheap, you can build it from scraps, but not many ppl know Linux/Ubuntu so they go the Windows route. In the end the option is theirs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stoney, the commands are relatively simply. There are right click mouses for the mac, any mouse I have bought from the Windows/Linux world works on my macs. The only difference is really instead of control you hit the command button. I use both Windows and Mac on a daily basis, jumping from one to the other over a KVM. Using a windows keyboard, I just hit the windows button on the mac or the control button on the PC. Its the same thing.</p>
<p>Overall, as a person who has used Windows all the way back to Win3.5, FreeBSD, Linux and its derivative Ubuntu, as well as MacOS from 3-X, I have to say the best experience I have had was on MacOS. Now as for Stoney&#8217;s first part of his comment, I have to agree, each one offered its pros, but it also offered its cons. But imo those pros and cons varied depending on the user. where as I find windows limiting in music production quality that I get from MacOS or Ubuntu. Windows availability is better for any games. Although this is no longer so mainstream, since the inclusion of intel processors I&#8217;m seeing more and more coming to the MacOS. Ubuntu, well I couldn&#8217;t do much except music work, as we go back to availability, there isn&#8217;t just that much.</p>
<p>All in all, it is the user in the end, and whatever they choose, thats what they use. I always recommend a unix based OS, so MacOS or Linux, and in most cases my friends will listen. However, the mac is costly, can only be used on their hardware, the pc is cheap, you can build it from scraps, but not many ppl know Linux/Ubuntu so they go the Windows route. In the end the option is theirs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarcM</title>
		<link>http://pcweenies.com/2009/07/02/mine-is-better-than-yours/#comment-2611</link>
		<dc:creator>MarcM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcweenies.com/?p=2059#comment-2611</guid>
		<description>You can tell this one is a popular topic simply based on number of responses :-)

May as well throw in my 2 cents. Linux is almost always my first choice for the average home user, since they don&#039;t need the super power functions of MS Office (Google docs, or OpenOffice.org work fine), and Ubuntu is inexpensive and easy to setup and maintain without being as easily susceptible as Win.  On the other hand, since most pcs still come with Win preinstalled many of my clients want it reinstalled after crashes, even if it costs them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can tell this one is a popular topic simply based on number of responses :-)</p>
<p>May as well throw in my 2 cents. Linux is almost always my first choice for the average home user, since they don&#8217;t need the super power functions of MS Office (Google docs, or OpenOffice.org work fine), and Ubuntu is inexpensive and easy to setup and maintain without being as easily susceptible as Win.  On the other hand, since most pcs still come with Win preinstalled many of my clients want it reinstalled after crashes, even if it costs them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

