Comments on: Tit for Tat http://pcweenies.com/2009/05/09/tit-for-tat/ Tech Comics for Sys Admins, IT Professionals, Engineers and Computer Geeks! Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:19:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Theala Sildorian http://pcweenies.com/2009/05/09/tit-for-tat/#comment-2300 Theala Sildorian Mon, 11 May 2009 02:06:42 +0000 http://pcweenies.com/?p=1821#comment-2300 Grandpa is my kinda outdoorsman. Hard core :D Grandpa is my kinda outdoorsman. Hard core :D

]]> By: Michael R http://pcweenies.com/2009/05/09/tit-for-tat/#comment-2299 Michael R Sun, 10 May 2009 22:25:45 +0000 http://pcweenies.com/?p=1821#comment-2299 I only partly disagree with Hari, I've been reading and following for the past 3+ years and have much enjoyed finally seeing the story arc's. Both in PCWeenies and Uncubed. Single Panels will either be a hit or miss, great when the do, worse when they don't. With the strips, even if they don't strike a funny bone on a particular comic, you walk away with character development. Which ultimately builds a "closeness to the characters", a needed realism/attachment so you can feel for them as they are put in different situations. Humor is humor, in part because of how a person either: Interprets(or misinterprets) the joke(Puns, straight Jokes), perceives it(Stand-up, observational), or relates to it(Inside jokes, personal circumstances). Great stuff Krishna, keep it up, I'll be here Michael I only partly disagree with Hari, I’ve been reading and following for the past 3+ years and have much enjoyed finally seeing the story arc’s. Both in PCWeenies and Uncubed. Single Panels will either be a hit or miss, great when the do, worse when they don’t. With the strips, even if they don’t strike a funny bone on a particular comic, you walk away with character development. Which ultimately builds a “closeness to the characters”, a needed realism/attachment so you can feel for them as they are put in different situations.

Humor is humor, in part because of how a person either: Interprets(or misinterprets) the joke(Puns, straight Jokes), perceives it(Stand-up, observational), or relates to it(Inside jokes, personal circumstances).

Great stuff Krishna, keep it up, I’ll be here

Michael

]]> By: Krishna http://pcweenies.com/2009/05/09/tit-for-tat/#comment-2298 Krishna Sun, 10 May 2009 16:39:48 +0000 http://pcweenies.com/?p=1821#comment-2298 thanks for the feedback Hari. I appreciate it. Unfortunately, I have no plans to move back to the single panel format. If the need warrants it, I may produce one. I want to define the characters a bit more - it's been my intent all along. Unfortunately, the single panel format does not work best for that. thanks for the feedback Hari. I appreciate it. Unfortunately, I have no plans to move back to the single panel format. If the need warrants it, I may produce one. I want to define the characters a bit more – it’s been my intent all along. Unfortunately, the single panel format does not work best for that.

]]> By: hari http://pcweenies.com/2009/05/09/tit-for-tat/#comment-2297 hari Sun, 10 May 2009 16:12:39 +0000 http://pcweenies.com/?p=1821#comment-2297 Much as I appreciate the continuing storyline, I think some of the sting is taken off the humour by not following the "gag" or "punchline" format used earlier. I really enjoyed your old one-panel comics which was really why I began reading PCW in the first place. I hope you will consider re-introducing them at some stage. They had something unique about them. I still like this style, but I feel the characters have got too "defined" now and the focus seems too much on the characters. Much as I appreciate the continuing storyline, I think some of the sting is taken off the humour by not following the “gag” or “punchline” format used earlier.

I really enjoyed your old one-panel comics which was really why I began reading PCW in the first place. I hope you will consider re-introducing them at some stage. They had something unique about them.

I still like this style, but I feel the characters have got too “defined” now and the focus seems too much on the characters.

]]>